John Paul Mitchell Systems , maker of the iconic Paul Mitchell and Tea Tree hair care lines, is facing a proposed class action lawsuit from consumers in Illinois and California who allege the company systematically misled them by labeling shampoos, conditioners, and styling products as “Made in the USA” despite the use of key foreign-sourced ingredients.
The case, Lauer et al. v. John Paul Mitchell Systems (1:25-cv-02438), filed March 7, 2025 , brings fresh scrutiny to how brands communicate product origins in a
global supply chain.
Lawsuit Details: What Products and Claims Are Involved According to court filings, Paul Mitchell’s best-sellers—including Tea Tree Lavender Mint Moisturizing Shampoo and Conditioner, Tea Tree Special Shampoo and Invigorating Conditioner, Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Shampoo and Conditioner, and Tea Tree Grooming Pomade—are all marketed as “Made in the USA.” Yet, lead plaintiffs allege these products contain prominent ingredients like tea tree oil, jojoba, agave, and shea butter , none of which originate from the United States .
The lawsuit extends beyond Tea Tree: JPMS's MITCH men’s hair care line is also targeted for using imported inputs but carrying the “Made in USA” claim. Plaintiffs say they purchased these items expecting exclusively domestic sourcing and manufacturing, paying a premium for what they believed to be U.S.-made products.
Legal Standards and FTC Guidance Central to the dispute are regulations enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) . The FTC requires that marketers ensure products labeled “Made in USA” are “all or virtually all” made from U.S.-sourced and U.S.-manufactured components. If not, clear disclaimers or qualifiers must be…
